Should you pay someone to pick your funds?

Active vs passive, measured category by category across Indian equity funds
An active fund charges you to beat the market. An index fund simply copies it, for a fraction of the fee. Paying more is only worth it if the manager actually wins — so this checks whether they do, using every fund's daily NAV since 2013 against the official index it is measured against. No opinions, just the record.
Funds Analysed
95
Direct plans, 3 categories
Index Funds Compared
67
Across 5 benchmarks
Indices Valued
14
PE / PB history since 1999
Daily NAV Records
21M+
~14,300 schemes

Today's verdict, by category

Scored 0–5 on how many funds beat the index, and by how much
Category Benchmark Funds Beating It Verdict Score
Large-CapPaying for a manager has usually paid off here NIFTY 100 TRI 61% STRONG ACTIVE 4.0 / 5
Mid-CapClose to a coin flip — a cheap index fund is the sensible default NIFTY MIDCAP 150 TRI 49% NEUTRAL 1.5 / 5
Small-CapAn edge on average, but fund selection matters a lot NIFTY SMALLCAP 250 TRI 59% LEAN ACTIVE 3.0 / 5

The one idea behind all of it

Why the fee difference is the whole question

Active fund

A manager picks the stocks and tries to beat the index.

Fee 0.5–1.0% a year

Index fund

Buys the whole index. No stock picking, no view taken.

Fee 0.1–0.2% a year

The gap looks small. Over twenty years it is not. So the only question worth answering is: in this category, did enough managers beat the index by enough to be worth the difference? Everything on this site exists to answer that.

What you can look up

Four questions the dashboard answers
1

Should I pay for an active fund in this category?

A verdict for Large-, Mid- and Small-Cap. It counts how many funds beat the index, by how much, and weights by fund size — so a huge fund's result counts more than a tiny one. That reflects what investors actually experienced, not what the average brochure claims.

95 direct-plan funds · calendar-year and rolling returns since 2013
2

Which funds have actually delivered?

Every fund ranked by how consistently it beat its benchmark, year after year — not by one lucky run. Leading funds get a harder test that asks whether the track record could simply be chance.

Skill test: information ratio, t-statistic, p-value
3

If I go passive, which index fund should I buy?

Index funds are not identical. Some track their index tightly, others drift. They are compared on tracking error (how faithfully they follow) and expense ratio (what they charge) — the two things that genuinely separate one from another.

67 index funds · 5 benchmarks · best tracking error 0.09%
4

Is the market expensive right now?

Price-to-earnings, price-to-book and dividend yield for 14 indices going back to 1999, shown as a percentile — so you can see where today sits against its own history rather than guessing whether a number is high.

Nifty 50 today: PE 20.4, 43rd percentile — fairly valued

How the numbers are worked out

Plain English

Direct plans only

Only direct plans, which carry no distributor commission. Returns are already net of the fund's fees.

A fair yardstick

Funds are compared against the Total Return Index, which includes dividends. Comparing against the plain price index would flatter every fund.

Rolling returns, not just calendar years

Returns are measured from every possible starting date. A single good calendar year can flatter a fund; hundreds of overlapping periods cannot.

The data

About 14,300 schemes and 21 million daily NAV records, refreshed from AMFI and NSE.

What this does not do

Worth reading before you act on anything here
  • This is not investment advice. It is research on what has already happened. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell, and it takes no account of your goals, taxes or circumstances.
  • Past performance does not predict future performance. A fund that beat its index for a decade can stop tomorrow — managers leave, funds grow too large, strategies stop working.
  • Funds that closed may be missing. Weak funds get merged away, which quietly flatters the survivors. Read the success rates as somewhat generous.